
The sermon was a rough one. The visiting American pastor never had us turn to a specific text. Instead, his half hour encouragement was a creative string of allusions to bible stories, anecdotes, and illustrations. Everyone in the gathering who had gotten out their bibles eventually put them away.
I sighed and looked around the room. Once again, half a dozen locals were attending the international church service. It was bad enough that the expat community was being served the equivalent of spiritual yogurt water (in case you’re not familiar with yogurt water, it’s not very much by way of sustenance). But locals tend to view Western pastors with a kind of awe, and often accept any content or form of teaching as faithful and worthy of emulation – simply because of the category of person who is delivering it.
I grimaced, seeing that a couple of our church-plant’s English-speaking local guys were in attendance, Darius* and Alan*. They seemed to be focusing intently on the sermon.
My wife and I shifted in our seats uncomfortably and I reminded myself that the mission field is merely a reflection of the state of evangelicalism in the sending countries. It’s not realistic to believe that our corner of Central Asia will somehow be isolated from some of the West’s more unfortunate Christian-ish exports. Joyce Meyer has already been translated into the local language, anti-Trinitarian cults have made their appearance (and are allegedly financing one of our former leaders-in-training), and the satellite TV channels are full of Benny Hinn-styled preachers. At least this sermonette’s main point was to encourage us to not be discouraged in sharing the gospel. Not a bad aim at all. But alas, the method and modeling were definitely lamentable.
After the service was finished, Darius made his way over to me.
“So, what did you think of the sermon?” he asked.
I bit my lip and half-smiled/half-grimaced, not sure what I should say. Darius has not always been the strongest when it comes to discernment, and tends to be quite drawn to the novel and the exciting. But he leaned in.
“That guy didn’t even have a text!” Darius whispered loudly, gesturing wildly with both his arms in the expressive body language of our locals (I have often maintained that our people group’s intonation and hand gestures make them the Italians of Central Asia). “He just told a bunch of stories… and he even added some details that aren’t there!”
My eyebrows rose in welcome surprise. Darius was not taken in by the creative delivery. Instead, his new – but apparently growing – convictions of ministry alarm bells had been going off.
“Darius,” I told him, “I’m very encouraged that you were concerned about that sermon. You’re right. He didn’t have a text he was explaining. He never asked us to open our Bibles. He did mess up some of the details of the Bible stories he told. Take note, when we have an opportunity to feed the people of God, we should attempt to prepare a feast, not merely pass out some snacks.”
Darius smiled and threw up his hands again. “What can I do? I learned from you guys about preaching.” Then he made his way over to the table where the sunflower seeds and chai were set out.
This final comment was particularly encouraging and humbling. My teammate and I who serve as temporary elders of our church plant are not eloquent preachers in the local language. Perhaps we will be five or ten years down the road, but right now we make it our aim to simply be clear, and to model basic expositional preaching in a second language – that is, preaching that makes the main points of the text the main points of the sermon and which seeks to faithfully explain the intent of the author. I’m still too tied to my manuscript. My colleague has more freedom in this way, but faces his own unique challenges while preaching in the local tongue from an English outline to our small group of believers. We often make comical language mistakes.
“We are insane,” instead of “We are not complete yet,” and “What should you do if you have a heart attack when you want want to give an offering?” instead of “What if you have a divided heart…?” have been a couple of our more recent bloopers. May God bless the long-suffering ears of these local believers who sit under our teaching week after week.
We have deeply invested in the simple method of steady, weekly, regular proclamation and explanation of God’s word. No flash, no bling. We sit in a circle of chairs and the preacher sits with another chair in front of him to serve as his pulpit. We took a couple years to get through Matthew and are currently taking a couple years to get through John, interspersed now and then by pressing topics or a recent series on the characteristics of a healthy church.
At times we are tempted to feel as if this steady sowing of God’s word is not accomplishing much. Much contemporary missiology calls into question the act of preaching altogether, alleging that it is a Western form import from the Reformation and not as effective as things such as DBS – Discovery Bible Studies. We don’t really buy those arguments though. Most of them betray a woeful ignorance of global church history (historically, preachers always, always emerge when new peoples are reached or awakenings take place), not to mention an under-baked understanding of the centrality of proclamation throughout the Scriptures.
The hardest doubts to handle have to do simply with how slowly people grow and change. After five years of this kind of unpacking of God’s word, how is it that more has seemingly not sunk in? How is it that character is not maturing more quickly and knowledge taking deeper root? Are we doing something wrong?
In faith, we believe that an unrelenting teaching and preaching ministry will eventually result in faithfulness and fruitfulness. But it sure is encouraging when we get to see a glimmer of that future. Darius noticed some very important things during that English church service. That noticing was evidence of growth in spiritual discernment. And spiritual discernment – that comes from soaking in the Word of God.
Preachers and teachers, keep on preaching and teaching, in season and out. And if by chance you ever get to preach on the mission field, please, for our sake, preach the Word. Don’t dumb it down either for the missionaries or for the locals.
Pass on serving mere yogurt water. Instead, serve them up a feast of some good solid meat.
*names changed for security
Photo by DJ Johnson on Unsplash
This post is such a testimony to God‘s faithfulness in preparing hearts to receive the gospel, his power in growing us, and in His blessing of your faithful planting and watering. What a joy you must’ve experienced to see the growth! Praise be to God! Truly the word of God is profitable!,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen!
LikeLike
I’ve been in a number of churches with a gifted teacher/preacher giving out the pure Word of God week after week. I would have thought people who are hearing the Word regularly like this would be growing just like this article states. However, I’ve found powerful teaching ministries to not produced mature Christians, unfortunately. James 1:22 says “But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.” What the teaching ministry in the church was producing was deception. That certainly wasn’t the goal of the preacher. He is a good man doing all he can to use his gifts. It wasn’t the goal of the hearer, they truly want God’s Word. But they are not able to keep up with these powerful teachings by obeying them. They don’t actually change anything. They just keep hearing and hearing and hearing, but there is no doing to it. There isn’t time. Its hard to implement change in one week and before you can really work on it, another powerful sermon comes. The deception is that a person begins to think, albeit unconsciously, that he can hear God’s Word and do nothing about it. The more powerful and clear and applicable the message, the greater the deception, unfortunately. What we need is obedience based teaching and preaching in smaller settings where we can help each other apply God’s Word and grow. There is much more to say about this, but this is enough for now.
LikeLike
I agree that there can be churches where the preaching is sound but the congregation fails to respond in obedience as they should. The question is, in that kind of situation do you fault the preaching? Many missionaries have said yes and attempted to get rid of preaching in favor of participatory Bible study and obedience-based discipleship. The result has often led to legalism and a kind of works righteousness and local believers who don’t know sound doctrine and are unable themselves to teach or preach effectively. Participatory Bible studies are wonderfully complementary to preaching, but neither should be pushing the other out. The word should be powerfully proclaimed from the front and the members should be meaningfully engaging it in other contexts as well. Likewise, knowledge and obedience should be going hand in hand in true discipleship, they’re not against each other. I would contend that if the preaching is sound but the body is made up of hearers and not doers, then that points to other major issues in the shepherding and structuring of that church. The passive church culture is showing symptoms that something is very wrong. But to remove sound preaching would only make it worse. The key is how to complement that sound preaching with structures, engagement, and culture such that the body starts responding to the word as it should.
LikeLike